Confidentiality of health information research paper

Language Assistance Available:

  • Español
  • አማርኛ
  • 繁體中文
  • Français
  • Tagalog
  • Русский
  • Português
  • Italiano
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Ɓàsɔ́ɔ̀-wùɖù-po-nyɔ̀
  • Igbo asusu
  • èdè Yorùbá
  • বাংলা
  • 日本語
  • 한국어
  • Kreyòl Ayisyen
  • العربية
  • Deutsch
  • Polski
  • ગુજરાતી
  • ภาษาไทย
  • اُردُو
  • فارسی
  • हिंदी
  • Deitsch
  • ខ្មែរ

Psychologists will share certain information about your diagnosis and treatment with the health insurance company or government program (like Medicare or Medicaid) that is paying for your treatment so that the company or program can determine what care is covered. The health insurance company or program is also bound by HIPPA to keep that information confidential. However, if you choose to pay out of pocket for services, and you choose to not ask your insurance provider for reimbursement, your insurance may not be aware that you are seeing a psychologist.

A minor’s personal representative (., parent, legal guardian, or other person having legal custody) may not have a right to receive a minor’s health care information as it relates to HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment, pregnancy and prenatal care, abortion, chemical dependence, and mental health outpatient service. 14 Researchers need to be aware of the impact of such regulations on protecting the confidentiality of research data for adolescents and the impact this has on their protocols, particularly when obtaining informed consent that involves parents or guardians.

A number of states have adopted this principle, and some have extended it to all physicians or mental health professionals. Duty to warn cases focus on (1) the seriousness of the threat of harm and (2) the identifiability of the victim (whether there is a specific individual at risk). Therefore, a doctor is not under any obligation to reveal threats of minor harm, threats that the doctor does not believe are serious, or general threats where there is no identifiable individual at risk. Given these parameters, duty to warn cases are not without controversy, and some people believe that they place the physician in the undesirable role of law enforcer, rather than healer. It is unclear how this issue affects confidentiality, and, many states have been hesitant to extend such a duty to health professionals.

Confidentiality of health information research paper

confidentiality of health information research paper

A number of states have adopted this principle, and some have extended it to all physicians or mental health professionals. Duty to warn cases focus on (1) the seriousness of the threat of harm and (2) the identifiability of the victim (whether there is a specific individual at risk). Therefore, a doctor is not under any obligation to reveal threats of minor harm, threats that the doctor does not believe are serious, or general threats where there is no identifiable individual at risk. Given these parameters, duty to warn cases are not without controversy, and some people believe that they place the physician in the undesirable role of law enforcer, rather than healer. It is unclear how this issue affects confidentiality, and, many states have been hesitant to extend such a duty to health professionals.

Media:

confidentiality of health information research paperconfidentiality of health information research paperconfidentiality of health information research paperconfidentiality of health information research paper